Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Randhawa Construction Co Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)
Appeal Number : Special Civil Application No. 22859 of 2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/12/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Randhawa Construction Co Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court)

The show cause notice should reflect the jurisdictional facts based on which the final order is proposed to be passed. The person proceeded against would then have an opportunity to show cause that the authority had erroneously assumed existence of a jurisdictional fact and, since the essential jurisdictional facts do not exist, the authority does not have jurisdiction to decide the other issues.

We find that the aforesaid observation would squarely apply to the present facts of the case on various judgments on the principles of natural justice is to the effect that wherever an order is likely to result in civil consequences, though the statute or provision of law, by itself, does not provide for an opportunity of hearing, the requirement of opportunity of hearing has to be read into the provision.”

In the instant case also not only the civil but the penal consequence pursuant to the impugned order of cancellation of certificate of registration, the petitioner would be liable. This judgment has come in the month of February 2022, the petition has been preferred on 14.11.2022 and the reply of the respondent has come before this Court on 28.11.2022. There is not a whisper of Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works (supra) nor the officer concerned has taken note of the fact that this Court has in Aggarwal Dyeing and Printing Works (supra) and in subsequent decisions has emphatically disapproved this conduct on the part of the officers. This unpalatable apathy to the principle of natural justice would need surely quick rectificational approach on the part of the officers concerned. We would expect in all the matters wherever there is absence/dearth of any reasonings, let in future this aspect be remembered that if from the date of the decision of this Court any mistakes have been committed, let that correction be made at the end of the officer concerned. If due to excessive dependence on artificial intelligence, the respondent would continue to defend its actions in total disregard to the ratio laid down in the said decision, the Court shall need to adopt stringent approach case wise.

Resultantly, this petition is allowed on the ground of principle of natural justice. We quash and set aside the show cause notice and the order of cancellation of registration with consequential order with a liberty to the respondent to issue a fresh notice with particulars of reasons incorporated with details and to provide reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and to pass appropriate speaking order on merits.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031