Case Law Details
Case Name : Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 995 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Mumbai
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored
Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai)
CESTAT Mumbai held that penalty under rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 can be levied only if it is found that the concerned person have dealt with the goods in any manner which they knew are liable to confiscation. Role of co-noticee proved and hence penalty justifiable.
Facts-
Show cause notice was issued alleging that assessee failed to pay appropriate excise duty on full air conditioner in split form and also alleging clearance against two dummy units along with interest and various penalty.
Conclusion-
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
Sponsored
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.