Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : Excise Appeal No. 995 of 2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/09/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai)

CESTAT Mumbai held that penalty under rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 can be levied only if it is found that the concerned person have dealt with the goods in any manner which they knew are liable to confiscation. Role of co-noticee proved and hence penalty justifiable.

Facts-

Show cause notice was issued alleging that assessee failed to pay appropriate excise duty on full air conditioner in split form and also alleging clearance against two dummy units along with interest and various penalty.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031