Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ultramix Computer Support System Pvt. Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & CE (CESTAT Mumbai) CESTAT Mumbai held that penalty under rule 209A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 can be levied only if it is found that the concerned person have dealt with the goods in any manner which they knew are liable to confiscation. Role of co-noticee proved and hence penalty justifiable. Facts- Show cause notice was issued alleging that assessee failed to pay appropriate excise duty on full air conditioner in split form and also alleging clearance against two dummy units along with interest and various penalt...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930