Case Law Details
S.S.G. Apparels Vs Deputy Assistant Commissioner GST (Central Taxes) (Madras High Court)
The petitioner challenges an order dated 30.09.2020 cancelling its registration under the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short ‘Act’).
2. While filling in the form for registration, the factory address of the petitioner being ‘No.8/829, Vigneshwara Nagar, Kanakkanthottam, Tirupur’ had been included twice under the column ‘additional places of business in the state’. The petitioner, wishing to rectify the error, had attempted to submit an application for amendment of the registration certificate. However, while filling the application Online, the Accountant had selected ‘cancellation’ from the drop down menu instead of ‘modification’. It is thus that the impugned order has come to be passed cancelling the registration with effect from 01.05.2020.
3. The only reason cited at paragraph 4 of the counter objecting to the prayer sought, is that the cancellation was effected only at the request of the petitioner. Hence it is for the petitioner to seek revocation of the same, in terms of the revisional remedies available. The counter does not dispute the explanation put forth by the petitioner or state that the error was not caused on account of an inadvertent mistake.
4. In light of the aforesaid and in the interests of substantial justice, I accept the explanation tendered by the petitioner and hold that the request for cancellation was only a simple and inadvertent error. The impugned order is set aside and the petitioner is permitted to make an application seeking restoration of registration, setting out the correct details of the principal and additional places of business.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
