Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Johnson Matthey Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)
Appeal Number : Defect Diary No. 70194/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/08/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Johnson Matthey Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner CGST (CESTAT Allahabad)

Held that mandatory deposit under section 35F of the Central Excise Act cannot be made by way of debit in the Electronic Credit Ledger maintained under CGST Act.

Facts-

The appellant has filed this appeal against the OIA passed by the Commissioner (Appeals), Allahabad whereby he rejected the Appeal on the ground that the Appellant had not made the pre deposit as per section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

The Registry had pointed out two defects in the instant Appeal. One was with respect to non-submission of self-attested copies of order in original and the second was with respect to the mandatory pre-deposit of 10% of disputed duty.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031