Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Amita Rajvedi Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos. 64 to 67/ALLD/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 25/07/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15 to 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Amita Rajvedi Vs DCIT (ITAT Allahabad)

Held that imposing penalty u/s. 271(1)(b) justified as necessary record impounded by the department was not supplied to the assessee, accordingly assessee failed to comply with the notice u/s. 142(1).

Facts-

The assessee is a practising Gynecologist. There was a survey under section 133A conducted on 11.9.2018 at the professional premises of the assessee. During survey operations, some papers and other material were impounded by the survey party. AO then issued show cause notice under section 274 r.w.s. 271(1)(b) of the Income Tax Act. AO passed the penalty orders under section 271(1)(b) whereby penalty was imposed on account of default / non-compliance of notice issued under section 142(1) of the Income Tax Act.

Conclusion-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031