Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Bhansali Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Anil Bhansali Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad) Held that payment of federal taxes on the different between FMV and the grant price establishes that assessee is paying tax treating the value of shares as perquisite. Accordingly, provisions of section 49(2AA) are applicable. Cost of acquisition of share cannot be FMV. Facts- During the course of assessment, AO noticed that the assessee had acquired 2,274 shares of M/s Microsoft Corporation in FY 2001-02 with a grant price of $ 5.97 and 735 shares during FY 2003-04 at the 0 cost under ESOP. AO further noticed that the assessee sold such shares during FY ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930