Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Bhansali Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Anil Bhansali Vs ACIT (ITAT Hyderabad)

Held that payment of federal taxes on the different between FMV and the grant price establishes that assessee is paying tax treating the value of shares as perquisite. Accordingly, provisions of section 49(2AA) are applicable. Cost of acquisition of share cannot be FMV.

Facts-

During the course of assessment, AO noticed that the assessee had acquired 2,274 shares of M/s Microsoft Corporation in FY 2001-02 with a grant price of

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31