Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Service Tax

Extended period cannot be invoked if divergent views exist even if ultimately Revenue view prevails

Case Law Details

Case Name
Rathi Steel & Power Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Advertisement Rathi Steel & Power Ltd. Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata) As regards invocation of extended period of Limitation, I find that the Appellant had made categorical submissions in this regard which finds mention in the order in appeal but there is no finding on the same. In any case, when the issue is no more res integra that where the assessee is entitled to claim cenvat credit of the tax paid under RCM, there cannot be any question of invocation of extended period. It is also a settled legal position that where there were divergent views on the issue and...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *