Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Garg Construction Company & Ors. Vs State of Haryana (Punjab & Haryana High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Garg Construction Company Vs State of Haryana (Punjab & Haryana High Court) Held that an application u/s. 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arbitrator, filed beyond three years, is barred by limitation. Facts- The applicant entered into an agreement with the respondents on 23.04.2004 for widening and strengthening on Dabwali Kalanwali via Desujodha Road K.M. 0.00 to 35.10 in Sirsa District. The work was to be completed within a period of twelve months, whereas it was completed on 31.05.2007. A dispute arose between the parties on account of the fact ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

  1. Sethunath V says:

    There is no time limit stated in sec,11. It depends on the Arbitration Agreement between parties. If there is no time limit stated in Arbitration Agreement, no time limit can be fixed by Court unless the transaction is hit by Limitation Act

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930