Case Law Details
Maya Rathi Vs ITO (Rajasthan High Court)
We find that the validity of first proviso to Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 has been assailed on the ground that the explanation ‘income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment’, has been restricted in its meaning under the explanation-1 to that provisions.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that such an explanation completely restricts the requirement of reason to believe that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment and therefore the provision is unconstitutional and against the settled judicial principal enunciated in several judicial pronouncement.
Learned Additional Solicitor General, Mr. R.D. Rastogi and Ms. Parinitoo Jain, Adv. appearing for respective respondents take notice and seek time to file reply to the main petition as well as application for interim relief.
Taking into consideration that the challenge is made to the legislature itself, before passing any interim order this Court would require the respondents particularly Union of India to make submissions after filing of reply. Therefore, we are not inclined to pass order of stay right now.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
