This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Limited scrutiny- AO cannot go beyond dispute raised in section 143(2) notice
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Chaitanya Bansibhai Nagori Vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Chaitanya Bansibhai Nagori Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Facts- The appellant is a Gynecologist doctor running a hospital in Ahmedabad. The assessee had purchased an immovable property through a registered sale deed for a total sale consideration of Rs.1,42,27,200/-The jantri value as per the stamp duty authority has been worked out to Rs.2,59,34,694/- and the appellant paid the stamp duty of Rs.12,70,800/-. There was a difference of Rs.1,17,07,495/- between the jantri value of Rs,2,59,34,694/- The Assessing Officer taxed this difference as income by the provisions of section 56(2)...
Author Info
