This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Labour Court cannot Adjudicate Workman’s Claim U/s. 33C(2) of Industrial Dispute Act in an Undetermined Claim
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Management of KSRTC Vs Sri K. Shivaram (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Management of KSRTC Vs Sri K. Shivaram (Karnataka High Court)
Section 33C(2) of the I.D. Act refers to any amount due to workman. Section 33C(1) of the Industrial Dispute Act (I.D. Act) speaks of any amount due to workman under the settlement or award under the provision of Chapter 5-A or 5-B of the I.D. Act.
The respondent claimed that he was entitled to claim the amount due to the injuries suffered by him during the course of employment. Therefore his claim was under the Act, 1923. In such event the claim lies before the Employee’s Compensation Commissioner and not before the Labour Court....
