Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Medreich Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. KAR ADRG 13/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/04/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Medreich Limited (GST AAR Karnataka)

AAR observed on examination of the records that the issues/questions raised by the applicant in the instant application have already been taken up by the audit team, in the case of applicant under the provisions of the CGST Act 2017. From the audit report mentioned supra it is evident that the impugned issues have already been decided in the audit proceedings. Further the fact that the unit was subjected to audit proceedings was admitted during the hearing.

The issues raised in the instant application and the issues decided under the audit proceedings are one and same. Thus first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017 is squarely applicable to the instant case, as all the conditions therein are fulfilled

In view of the foregoing, The application is rejected as “inadmissible”, in terms of first proviso to Section 98(2) of the CGST Act 2017.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, KARNATAKA

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031