Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd (CAAR MUMBAI)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
In re Audio Distribution House Pvt. Ltd (CAAR MUMBAI) The projector under consideration has got certain additional ports such as HDMI, S-Video, audio-video, which make it capable of being a video projector and consequently classifiable under CTH 85286900 also. GI Rule 3 states that “the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description”. The website, https://www.optomausa.com/, of the manufacturer of the impugned device was referred to understand how the projector is marketed by the manufacturer. It is listed un...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930