Case Law Details
Case Name : So-Hum Trading Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (Preventive)(CESTAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All CESTAT CESTAT Kolkata
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
So-Hum Trading Company Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Kolkata)
We find that the Appellant was not availing any benefit in terms of the Exemption Notification and there was no occasion for confiscation of the live goods under Bill of Entry No.2321708 dated 05.07.2017 as the letter dated 16.07.2017 shows that the Country of Origin Certificate for these goods had been sent back to Bangladesh for rectification which was much before the DRI’s intervention on 19/22 July 2017. It is our considered view that confiscation and subsequent redemption fine for Bill of Entry No. 2321708 dated 05.07.20...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

