Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Indication Instruments Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana)
Appeal Number : Advance Ruling No. HAR/HAAR/2018-19/19
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/10/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Indication Instruments Ltd. (GST AAR Haryana)

The applicant has time and again not appeared under the pretext of proper communications towards the date of hearing not being received.

The last Personal Hearing was provided for 09.10.2018 and when the staff enquired about the applicant’s schedule for the day’s personal hearing, the applicant vide their letter dated 13.101018 received in the office by ordinary post on 18.10.2018 had stated  that the information for personal hearing of 0910.2018 was received by them on 12.10.2018 through ordinary post, whereas the communication was also emailed on 03.10.2018 at the email IDs given in the application i.e. mail@veethree.com and sunderlal.soni@veethree.com.

Surprisingly for personal hearing scheduled for today, i.e. 16.10.2018, again the applicant has stated that no communication was received by them, although, the office had duly emailed the scheduled personal hearing for today at their email Ids provided in the application as mentioned above.

It seems that the applicant is deliberately avoiding personal hearing and no purpose seems to be served by providing any further opportunities. Since the applicant does not seem to be interested in obtaining advance ruling, the application is filed.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031