This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Mere audit objection cannot be sole ground for holding clandestine manufacture & removal
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- BST Infratech Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise (CESTAT Kolkata)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Kolkata
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
BST Infratech Limited Vs Commissioner of CGST & Excise, Bolpur Commissionerate (CESTAT Kolkata)
We find that no physical verification of input consumption qua finished goods manufactured thereto was carried out by the department. The duty has been demanded on the basis of audit objection without causing any investigation. It is our considered view that the objection of audit cannot be the basis or reason to believe to further investigate the matter and cannot be the sole ground for holding clandestine manufacture and removal, in absence of any corroborative evidence. It is observed from re...
