No Section 271D Penalty for cash received from commission agent against sale of crops

Hardeep. Singh Vs JCIT (ITAT Chandigarh)

The issue under consideration is whether CIT is correct in charging penalty u/s 271D and 271E?

In the present case the Cash amount received or repaid by the assessee from the commission agent against the sale of the crops so it was neither the loan nor the deposit, therefore the provisions of Section 269SS and

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.