Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu)
Appeal Number : Order No. 03/ARA/2020
Date of Judgement/Order : 31/01/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Tamilnadu)

1. Whether the Transitional Provisions under Section 142(11)(c), (Chapter XX) of TNGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017 is correctly applicable for the remaining installments of “Mobilization Advance’, which transitioned into the GST regime and to be adjusted/deducted by the applicant post the implementation of GST (i.e. Post July 1, 2017)?

The Transitional Provisions under Section 142(11)(c ) is not applicable to the case at hand.

2. Whether, the applicant would be liable to pay GST, under the provisions of the TNGST Act, 2017/CGST Act, 2017 and allied laws, on the installments of the ‘Mobilization Advance’, which has transitioned into the GST regime and adjusted /deducted by the applicant post the implementation of GST (i.e. post July 1, 2017)?

The Mobilisation advance to the extent received prior to the implementation of GST towards supply of Works Contract Service is not to be subjected to GST as per the provisions of Section 142(11)(b) of the GST Act 2017.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031