This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advance authorization- Para 4.28(f) of FTP-HoP not applicable to cases where export obligation fulfilled
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- PCL Oil & Solvent Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All CESTAT, CESTAT Ahmedabad
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCL Oil & Solvent Limited Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
CESTAT Ahmedabad has held that Para 4.28(f) of Handbook of Procedure, 2004-09 relating to regularization of bonafide default by exporters using Advance Authorisations, cannot be applied straight away to normal imports where export obligations have been fulfilled. The Tribunal in this regard noted that policy prescribed in Para 4.1.5 of FTP permitted the use of left-over material for manufactured goods and clear the same in domestic tariff area. The Revenue department had demanded Customs duty on the inputs imported dut...





