Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta & ors. Vs Nirala Projects Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)
Appeal Number : Case No. 75/2019
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/12/2019
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Sh. Suresh Kumar Gupta & ors. Vs Nirala Projects Pvt. Ltd. (National Anti-Profiteering Authority)

Provisions of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 are aimed at ensuring that the recipient gets the commensurate benefit, in the form of reduction of price, in case of any tax rate reduction and/or incremental benefit of ITC (i.e. a sacrifice made by the Govt. from its tax kitty) and the method of interpretation of this provision has been given in the text of Section 171 of the CGST Act, 2017 itself. We observe that the said provision clearly links profiteering to be a function of each supply of goods or services or both and hence, profiteering needs to be computed at the level of each invoice and not at the entity level or any consolidated level. From a complete reading of Section 171 of the Act ibid, it is amply clear that the total quantum of profiteering by an entity/registrant is the sum total of all the benefits that stood denied to each of the recipients/consumers individually. The intent of the words “commensurate reduction” is also clearly explained by the words “by reduction in price”.

Accordingly, the Authority hereby determines the profiteered amount as Rs. 2,88,43,422/- as per the provisions of Rule 133 (1) of the above Rules. The above amount shall be paid by the Respondent to the eligible buyers as per the details given in Annexure-21 of the DGAP’s above Report within a period of 3 months from the date of passing of this order along with interest ©18% per annum from the date from which the above amount was collected by him from the buyers till the payment is made failing which it shall be recovered by the concerned Commissioner CGST/SGST and paid to the concerned eligible buyers. The ITC for the balance period of the project shall also be passed on by the Respondent otherwise the buyers shall be at liberty to approach the State Screening Committee Uttar Pradesh.

In view of the above facts, this Authority under Rule 133 (3) (a) of the CGST Rules, 2017 orders that the Respondent shall reduce the prices to be realized from the buyers of the flats commensurate with the benefit of ITC received by him as has been detailed above.

FULL TEXT OF THE NATIONAL ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031