Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mr. Biravelli Bhaskar Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 398/HYD/2015
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/06/2015
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts of the case:

Assessee being an individual offered income from house property, interest and share incomes from firms and other sources. In the course of assessment, A.O. noticed that assessee has received an amount of Rs.2,50,000 as gift from HUF and also noticed that amount of Rs.90,000 was found credited to his loan account which is not reflected the firms accounts. Holding that HUF is not a ‘relative’ under section 56(2), A.O. treated the amount of Rs.2,50,000 as income of the assessee. Likewise, an amount of Rs.90,000 was also treated as income on the reason that the same was not reflected in the ledger account copy of the firm.
Question of Law:

Whether HUF could be treated as relative u/s 56(2)(vi)?

Contention of the Assessee:

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031