Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pankaj Mahajan Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.4085/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/06/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief Fact of the case

In the present case, AO come to know about cash deposit of Rs.13.01 Lac by the assessee through AIR Information. On being called upon to explain the source of such cash deposit, assessee submitted that he has inherited a sum of Rs.13 lac from his mother who has died on 14-08-2006 and produced copy of her income tax return, copy of will and death certificate in support of his claim. However, the A.O. was not satisfied with the explanations and evidences submitted by the assessee.

A.O. also expressed the applicability of wealth tax as the value of cash and jewellery as claimed by the assessee exceeded Rs.15 Lacs. Since no Wealth-tax return was filed and there was nothing to show the availability of cash to the extent of Rs.13.01 lac, the AO made addition for this sum as ‘Income from undisclosed sources.’ On being aggrieved, the assessee filed the appeal with CIT(A) who deleted the addition made by the AO based on submissions made by the assessee. Revenue filed the appeal against such deletion before the Tribunal.

Contention of Assessee

It was claimed that Shri A.C. Gupta, executor of the will of his mother, opened the locker of Almirah on 12.02.2007 kept at their residence in the present of three witnesses and cash of Rs.15.06 Lacs was found.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031