Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Nafe Singh Gahalawat (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No: 3848/Del/2012
Date of Judgement/Order : 21/05/2014
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Issue- On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(Appeals) has erred on facts and in law in deleting the addition of Rs.10,83,555/- which was made by the Assessing Officer by invoking the provisions of section 43B of the Act as the service tax payable in the balance sheet was not deposited before due date of filing of return.

Held- Disallowance u/s 43B of the Act. No expenditure has been claimed by the assessee in its books of accounts. Under such circumstances the question of disallowance u/s 43B does not arise.

 INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI

BEFORE SHRI J.SUDHAKAR REDDY, AM

AND SHRI RAJPAL YADAV, JM

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031