This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Bombay HC took Objection of SMS from Dept Advocate that Court is pressurising him
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Pr. CIT Vs M/s. Starflex Sealing India Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
PCIT Vs Starflex Sealing India Pvt. Ltd (Bombay High Court)
SMS communication by Mr. Pinto to the Associate of this Court is contrary to the statement made on behalf of the Revenue yesterday by the learned Additional Solicitor General, assisted by Mr. Mohanty, learned advocate for the Revenue. Requesting an Advocate to put in a praecipe the facts which correctly records the reason for having the matters taken out of turn and being put on board, does not in any manner detract from dignity of an advocate. We are not sure, whether this indignation on the the part of the Advocate Mr. Pinto stems...
