Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Mail Related Services Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M/s. Mail Related Services Vs Commissioner of Service Tax (CESTAT Chennai) It is not disputed that the costs related to franking are paid directly to the Post Master General by the appellant’s clients or are otherwise paid by the appellant and subsequently, reimbursed by the said clients. Therefore, it cannot be alleged that the said charges are accruing to the appellants. Hence, in our view, they cannot be made part of the value of taxable service. Even in cases where the appellants pay the franking cost to the postal department on behalf of their clients, they get reimbursed for the same b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031