Case Law Details
Case Name : K. Madhav Kamath Brother & Co. Vs Asst. Comm. of Central Excise (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
All High Courts Karnataka High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
CA Sumit Grover
Recently, Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in the matter of K. Madhav Kamath Brother & Co. v. Asst. Comm. of Central Excise, pronounced that even if service tax is paid prior to Show Cause Notice, still the penalty shall be leviable u/s 76/78, 77 of Finance Act’94.
Brief facts of the case:
The matter pertains to the period Jan’06 to Oct’06. The department issued SCN for non-filing of return& non-payment of service tax along with the levy of penalty on the same(within the SCN itself) u/s 76/78 & 77 of Finance Act’94
However, the assessee d...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
it is already settled law any genuine error takes place, revenue cannot go ahead with penalty, if the sections say penalty is to be paid such sections deserve to be delivered by courts of competent jurisdiction under doctrine of severability, so the appellant can move honorable SC for necessary relief, even hon SC granted reief to PwC matter in satyam computers matter,the CAs made genuine errors that way hon SC gave relief is a world known fact!
i commend Appellant can move hon SC for relief under Art 32 civil writ instead of SLP under Art 136