Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M/s. Ford India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner, LTU (CESTAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : Appeal Nos. ST/196 & 197/2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/01/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

M/s. Ford India Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner (CESTAT Chennai)

 Regarding the tax liability on the consideration received due to termination of the arrangement, we note that no identifiable service can be attributed for such consideration. It is rather a termination of arrangement which itself the original authority held as a service. We note that by terminating the arrangement, the appellants are adversely put to certain business The consideration has been paid for such loss. No identifiable service could be attributed for such payment during the material time. Accordingly, the tax liability on such consideration could not be sustained.

FULL TEXT OF THE CESTAT ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031