Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs. Shyam Sunder Dhanuka (ITAT Kolkata)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1869-1870/Kol/2013
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/07/2016
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07 & 2007-08
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

DCIT Vs. Shyam Sunder Dhanuka (ITAT Kolkata)

There is no requirement for levying penalty under explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) that the party to whom the assessment proceedings were initiated under section 153C should be searched under section 132, however, notice under section 274 should specifically state the grounds mentioned in section 271(1)(c), i.e., whether it is for concealment of income or for furnishing of incorrect particulars of income. Sending printed form where all the grounds mentioned in section 271 are mentioned, would not satisfy requirement of law. Therefore, show cause notice under section 274 was defective as it did not spell out the ground on which the penalty was sought to be imposed. Hence, penalty was deleted.

FULL TEXT OF THE ITAT ORDER IS AS FOLLOWS:-

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031