Case Law Details
K.K.Ramesh Vs. Union of India (Madras High Court)
By consent, the Writ Petition itself is taken up for final disposal.
2. The petitioner seems to have been aggrieved by the improper implementation of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act and the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, which were passed during the year 2017.
3. The writ petition was entertained on 28.08.2017 and the learned Additional Government Pleader, who accepts notice on behalf of the fifth respondent, has undertaken to file counter-affidavit.
4. When the matter was listed on 12.12.2017, on that day, on behalf of the second respondent, the Commissioner, Central GST and Central Excise, Madurai, has filed his counter-affidavit. This Court has taken note of the contents of the counter-affidavit and in paragraph No. 3 observed that “in view of the fore-goings, it is represented on behalf of the second respondent/the Union of India that the petitioner’s prayer No. (a) to (d) have been complied with. However, the petitioner, who appeared in person, informs this Court that the prayer No.(d) for increasing the flying squad in State Level, District Level, Zonal Level to monitor the movement of goods and E-Way Bills has not been answered in a proper manner by the second respondent/ the Union of India”.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
