Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Income Tax Officer Vs Mrs. Anvita Abbi (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 3707/Del/2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 20/09/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2008- 09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Admittedly, learned CIT(A) admitted the fresh evidences but did not allow any opportunity to the Assessing Officer for examining those evidences or furnishing any evidence in rebuttal as required by sub-rule (3) of Rule 46A. Therefore, the order of learned CIT(A) is in violation of Rule 46A. In view of the above, we set aside the orders of authorities below and restore the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer. We direct the assessee to produce all the evidences before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer is also directed to allow adequate opportunity to the assessee to produce all these evidences before him. The Assessing Officer will re-adjudicate the issue afresh after considering all the evidences as may be furnished by the assessee before him.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,  NEW DELHI

ITA No. 3707/Del/2011

ITO Vs. Mrs. Anvita Abbi

Date of Decision: 20.09.2013

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031