Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Hitesh Narendrabhai Shah (HUF) Vs. ITO (ITAT Ahemadabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 2370/Ahd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 04/01/2013
Related Assessment Year : 2007- 2008
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Only reason advanced for making dis allowance out of the interest paid to two coparceners was that the interest paid to other parties was at 12% per annum. We find that the interest paid to two coparceners at the rate of 15% could not be said to be excessive, considering the prevailing rate of interest during the relevant assessment year 2007-2008. Once it is found that the rate of interest paid to two coparceners at 15% is not excessive, no dis allowance could be made by invoking the provisions of Section 40A(2)(b) of the Act. The loans raised from two coparceners could be safely relied upon by the assessee-HUF as the coparceners may not demand the amount of loan back in the near future and the level of confidentiality is obviously more with regard to these coparceners. In view of the fact that the interest paid to coparceners at the rate of 15% could not be said to be excessive, we hold that the provision of Section 40A(2)(b) was wrongly invoked in this case. Accordingly, the addition of Rs.42,1 12/- is deleted and the ground of the appeal of the assessee is allowed.

ITAT AHMEDABAD, “A” BENCH

ITA No. 2370/Ahd/2010

[Asstt. Year : 2007-2008]

Shri Hitesh Narendrabhai Shah (HUF) Vs. ITO

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031