Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. Prem Hospital (P) Ltd. Vs. ITO, Ward 39(3), (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No.5023/Del./2011
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/04/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2005-06
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mere erroneous claim in the absence of any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars, is no ground for levying penalty, especially when there is nothing on record to show that the explanation offered by the assessee was not bona fide or any material particulars were concealed or furnished inaccurate .

In these circumstances, we have no hesitation in observing that no penalty is exigible in relation to claim for deduction of excess depreciation and interest on amount borrowed for building which was incomplete. Therefore, we hold that penalty is not imposable in this case and action of authorities below in imposing/confirming the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act is neither proper nor justified.

INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI

ITA No.5023/Del./2011 – (Assessment Year: 2005-06)

M/s Lala Harbhagwan Dass Memorial &

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031