Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner Of Central Excise Vs M/s Bhawani Enterprises (CESTAT Ahemdabad)
Appeal Number : Appeal No. ST/315 of 2009
Date of Judgement/Order : 01/02/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

In view of the decision of the Gujarat High Court, that no discretion is vested in the authority to levy a penalty below the minimum prescribed limit, it is held that penalty imposed under Section 76 cannot be reduced by invoking the provisions of Section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994 – Penalty has to be either the quantum imposed under Section 76 or Nil if reasonable cause is shown – Penalty under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994 by original authority is restored.

IN THE CUSTOMS, EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD
COURT NO.II

Appeal No. ST/315 of 2009

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031