Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Commissioner of Central Excise Vs Alidhara Textool Engineers Pvt. Ltd. (CESTAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : Final Order Nos. A/216-222/2009-WZB/AHD
Date of Judgement/Order : 16/1/2009
Related Assessment Year :
Sponsored

Rule-2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules does not require that service has to be rendered at the factory of the manufacturer for the purpose of eligibility for service tax credit. Therefore the stand of the revenue that since the service was provided at the buyer’s premises credit is not admissible cannot be accepted. What has to be examined is whether the service provided is in or in relation to manufacture.

Once the whole transaction of manufacture of the machine, erection and commissioning and supply is treated as one transaction and excise duty is charged on the whole transaction value, services rendered for the purpose of completion of this whole transaction has to be treated to have been rendered in or in relation to the manufacture.

____________________________________________________________

IN THE CESTAT, WEST ZONAL BENCH, AHMEDABAD

Commissioner of Central Excise, VAPI

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031