Case Law Details
Case Name : Ramji Veerji Patel & Ors. Vs Revenue Divisional Officer & Ors. (Supreme Court of India)
Related Assessment Year :
Courts :
Supreme Court of India
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mr. Pallav Shishodia, learned senior counsel for the appellants raised two-fold contention. His first contention was that the appellants’ objections about the availability of land belonging to TELC which is situated behind the existing depot of the Corporation and was available for sale were not rationally considered by the RDO and the Government. He submitted that the livelihood of about 40 members of the family was directly affected by the compulsory acquisition of their land and, therefore, the objections ought to have been considered in a reasonable manner more so since the public purpos...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Sir,
The Hon’ble Supreme Court was probably referring to Section 3 (e) of The Land Acqisition Act,1894 (Which excludes Governmental company from the defination of Company) and not “Section 3 (e)” of Companies Act,1956 while concluding that Food Corporation Of India (FCI) is not covered under the amended defination of ‘Company’ as provided in The Land Acqisition Act,1894.