Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT, Chennai Vs A R Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : Tax Case (Appeal) No. 881 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 18/07/2011
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

CIT, Chennai Vs A R Mercantile Pvt. Ltd. (Madras High Court)- The Tribunal accepted the case of the assessee based on the letter issued by the Assistant Executive Engineer of the Tamilnadu Electricity Board, that the windmill was commissioned on 30.09.1995. Following the earlier order in the case of Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kences Foundation (P) Ltd [2006 (203) CTR (Mad) 249], wherein a similar relief was granted to the assessee, the present appeal of the assessee was allowed.

Given the fact that the issue regarding the commission of windmill on 30.9.1995 is disclosed in the books of accounts and calls for depreciation under the regular assessment year, in view of Section 158BB(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, we do not find any ground to consider the said issue, as a question of law. The Tax Case Appeal stands dismissed.   

CIT, Chennai Vs A R Mercantile Pvt Ltd

Madras high Court

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031