This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Debatable issues are not “mistakes apparent from the record” u/s 154
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- M/s. Mepco Industries Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. (Supreme Court of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- Supreme Court of India
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
The assessee filed a revision petition u/s 264 in which it claimed that the subsidy received by it from the government was a capital receipt and not chargeable to tax in view of P.J. Chemicals Ltd 210 ITR 830 (SC). The Petition was allowed by the CIT. Subsequently, the Supreme Court held in Sahney Steel and Press Works 228 ITR 253 that the subsidy received by that assessee was a revenue receipt. Pursuant to this judgement, the CIT passed a rectification order u/s 154 by which he held that the subsidy was a revenue receipt. The assessee challenged the said order by a writ petition before the Ma...
