Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajinder Kumar Mittal Vs. ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Appeal Number : ITA No. 1109/Del/ 2007
Date of Judgement/Order : 07/09/2009
Related Assessment Year : 1999- 2000
Sponsored

RELEVANT PARAGRAPH

22. Applying the ratio of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court and jurisdictional Delhi High Court and judgment of High Court of Punjab & Haryana in above referred cases to the present case before us, the position of law applicable to the present case, in our opinion, would be as under:-

(i) Mere identification of donor and showing movements of gift amount through banking channels is not sufficient to prove the genuineness of the gift,

(ii) Since the claim of the gift is made by the assessee, the onus lies on him not only to establish the identity of the person making the gift but also his capacity to such a gift. The assessee has to prove that the money has actually been received as a gift from donor,

(iii) It is the burden of the assessee to showrf and demonstrate what kind of relationship or what kind of love and affection the donor has with the assessee, and to explain circumstances in which gift were made.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031