Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Anil Kumar Prasad Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Anil Kumar Prasad Vs CIT (ITAT Delhi)

The Delhi ITAT condoned a delay of 168 days in filing an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in a case arising from assessment proceedings under Sections 153C and 153A of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) had dismissed the assessee’s appeal in limine solely on the ground of delay without examining the matter on merits. Before the Tribunal, the assessee contended that he had no knowledge of the assessment order dated 29.02.2024, which constituted sufficient cause for delayed filing. After considering the facts, the ITAT observed that the explanation provided by the assessee justified condonation of delay and deserved acceptance in the interest of justice. Accordingly, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(A) and restored the matter for fresh adjudication on merits after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The appeal was thus allowed for statistical purposes, reaffirming a liberal approach in matters involving procedural delay where sufficient cause exists.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT DELHI

This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 17.11.2025 of the Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeal), Delhi-26, [hereinafter referred to as the ‘Ld. CIT(A)] arising out of the Assessment Order dated 29.02.2024 passed under section 153C r.w.s. 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, Central Circle-13, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as the ‘AO’) pertaining to Assessment Years (A.Y.) 2020-21.

2. During the course of hearing, none appeared on behalf of the assessee.

3. On perusal of the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A), it is seen that the Ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee in limine by not condoning the delay of 168 days in filing the appeal before him. The assessee in the Revised ground no. 2 of the appeal filed on 15.04.2026 submits that the assessee had no knowledge of the assessment order u/s 153C of the Act dated 29.02.2024 and, therefore, there was a delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A).

4. On a careful consideration of the above fact, we are of the considered view that there was a sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal before the ld. CIT(A). Hence, the delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) is condoned. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) and restore the matter back to the file of the ld. CIT(A) to decide the appeal on merits after giving reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee and in accordance with law. In the result, grounds of appeal filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

5. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 26.05.2026.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031