Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Navroze Shiamak Marshall Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Navroze Shiamak Marshall Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Revenue Itself Treated It as Deemed Dividend – Then Exemption u/s 10(34) Must Follow- Mumbai ITAT Deletes Tax on Share Buyback n an interesting and significant ruling, the Mumbai ITAT held that where the Revenue itself treats consideration received on buyback/reduction of share capital as deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(d), the consequential exemption u/s 10(34) cannot be denied to the shareholder. The assessee had purchased shares of Spirax Marshall Pvt. Ltd. in March 2006 and sold them back to the company under a scheme of arrangement approved by...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Entire Books Cannot Be Rejected for One Unproved Expense: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 10(10B) Exemption Allowed on BSNL VRS Compensation: ITAT Ahmedabad On-Money Addition Restricted to Co-owner’s Investment Share: ITAT Ahmedabad Section 54B: Time to Revisit Rural Agricultural Land Withdrawal Rules Section 80P(2)(d) Deduction Allowed on Interest from Co-operative Bank Deposits: ITAT Pune View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031