Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Palanikumar Velusamy Krishnakumar (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Palanikumar Velusamy Krishnakumar (ITAT Chennai) Bank Deposits Treated as Business Receipts – ITAT Upholds Deletion of ₹1.71 Cr Addition U/s 69A The AO received information that the assessee had bank credits of ₹1.71 crore, including cash deposits of ₹75.29 lakh during the demonetisation period, and since the assessee had allegedly not filed a return or explained the deposits, the AO completed ex-parte assessment u/s 144 and treated the entire amount as unexplained money u/s 69A. Before the CIT(A), the assessee submitted that: He was a battery dealer and authorised distribu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT Deletes ₹1.14 Crore Addition Based Solely on Hawala Operator’s Statement; Cross-Examination Denial Proves Fatal ITAT Grants Full TDS Credit Despite Employer’s Failure to Deposit Tax ITAT Deletes Bogus LTCG Addition on Green Crest Shares; Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Mumbai ITAT Deletes Section 270A Penalty on Estimated Income and Defective Show-Cause Notice Bangalore ITAT: TDS Credit Cannot Be Denied Merely Because It Was Omitted in Original Return View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930