Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : M. M. Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
M. M. Brothers Vs ITO (ITAT Pune) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Estimated GP Addition – ITAT Pune Deletes Rs 5.41 Lakh Penalty The ITAT Pune allowed the assessee’s appeal & deleted penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c), holding that penalty cannot be imposed where quantum addition is made purely on estimation basis. In the quantum proceedings, the CIT(A) had directed estimation of gross profit @2.25% instead of sustaining bogus purchase addition, and penalty was later levied on such estimated income. Relying on Bombay High Court judgment in PCIT vs. Colo Colour Pvt. Ltd., the Tribuna...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930