Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Pantime Finance Company Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Pantime Finance Company Pvt Ltd (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai upheld CIT(A)’s order deleting additions made pursuant to a revision u/s 263, holding that once the base revision order itself is quashed by Tribunal, all consequential proceedings automatically fail. The reassessment order passed u/s 147 r.w.s. 263 & 144B had added substantial income after PCIT invoked revision alleging lack of enquiry and non-compliance with penny stock SOP guidelines. Tribunal noted that earlier co-ordinate bench had already quashed the revision order u/s 263 on both legal and factual grounds, including ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930