Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandra Lalit Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandra Lalit Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) AO reopened assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B & made addition of ₹81.99 lakh u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) on purchase of property, being difference between actual consideration and stamp duty valuation. The CIT(A) granted partial relief by restricting addition to assessee’s 1/3rd share (₹27.33 lakh), but sustained balance addition. Before ITAT, the assessee contended that the variation between purchase consideration (₹8.27 cr) and stamp value (₹9.09 cr) was only 9.91%, i.e., within 10% tolerance band introduced through amendments to sec. 50C/56, which...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period DVO Valuation Without Notice Invalid: Matter Remanded for Fresh Determination Section 56(2)(x): Stamp Value on Booking Date to Apply – ITAT Deletes Addition Past Savings Accepted: Small Cash Introduction Cannot Be Treated as Unexplained Reassessment for AY 2015-16 Time-Barred – ITAT Quashes Entire Penny Stock Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930