Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandra Lalit Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandra Lalit Sanghvi Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) AO reopened assessment u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B & made addition of ₹81.99 lakh u/s 56(2)(vii)(b) on purchase of property, being difference between actual consideration and stamp duty valuation. The CIT(A) granted partial relief by restricting addition to assessee’s 1/3rd share (₹27.33 lakh), but sustained balance addition. Before ITAT, the assessee contended that the variation between purchase consideration (₹8.27 cr) and stamp value (₹9.09 cr) was only 9.91%, i.e., within 10% tolerance band introduced through amendments to sec. 50C/56, which...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930