Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

ITAT Mumbai: Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Deleted – Estimated Bogus Purchase Addition Cannot Trigger Penalty

Case Law Details

Case Name
R. J. Corporation Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2010-11
Advertisement
R. J. Corporation Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) In the ITAT Mumbai allowed the assessee’s appeals and deleted penalties levied u/s 271(1)(c) for A.Ys. 2010-11 & 2011-12, holding that penalty cannot survive where additions are purely based on estimation of profit from alleged bogus purchases. The assessee firm was subjected to reassessment based on Sales Tax Department information alleging accommodation purchase bills. The AO rejected books u/s 145(3) and estimated profit at 12.5% on such purchases instead of disallowing them fully, after which penalty was levied for concealment/inaccurate particu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 5,525

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *