Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Patodia Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Manoj Kumar Patodia Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata) ITAT Kolkata – Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) Deleted; Completion of Assessment u/s 143(3) Implies Condonation of Alleged Non-Compliance In Manoj Kumar Patodia (AY 2006-07), penalty of ₹30,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) was levied for alleged non-compliance with notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) during reassessment proceedings relating to foreign bank account information. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty alleging willful non-cooperation. The ITAT held that since the AO ultimately completed assessment u/s 143(3) and not u/s 144, any alleged non-compliance stood impliedly c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reopening Fails on Both Counts: Invalid Sec 148A Notice and Time-Barred Sec 148 Render Assessment Void Coffee Income: Rule 7B Overrides Rule 7 – ITAT Remands for Segregation of Own vs Purchased Produce Duty Drawback Taxable Only on Receipt – ITAT Deletes Addition & U/s 270A Penalty Skill Development = “Education” – ITAT Allows Sec 11 Exemption to Charitable Trust No Penalty for Wrong Claim or Head of Income – ITAT Deletes Section 271(1)(c) Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930