Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manoj Kumar Patodia Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Manoj Kumar Patodia Vs DCIT (ITAT Kolkata)

ITAT Kolkata – Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) Deleted; Completion of Assessment u/s 143(3) Implies Condonation of Alleged Non-Compliance

In Manoj Kumar Patodia (AY 2006-07), penalty of ₹30,000/- u/s 271(1)(b) was levied for alleged non-compliance with notices u/s 143(2) & 142(1) during reassessment proceedings relating to foreign bank account information. The CIT(A) upheld the penalty alleging willful non-coop

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Reassessment Quashed – Notice U/s 148 Held Time-Barred & Ante-Dated ITAT Chennai: No Addition U/s 56(2)(vii) Where Valuation Difference Within 10% Tolerance Band Penalty U/s 270A Deleted – AO Failed to Specify Misreporting Clause ITAT Chennai: Registration u/s 12AB & 80G Cannot Be Denied Merely Because Trust Has Not Yet Started Activities Penalty U/s 271(1)(c) Not Sustainable on Deemed Addition U/s 56(2)(vii)(b) – ITAT Chennai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031