Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Suman Jagannath Sankhe Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Suman Jagannath Sankhe Vs CIT (Appeals) (ITAT Mumbai) In Suman Jagannath Sankhe vs CIT(A) (A.Y. 2016-17), reassessment was initiated based on alleged cash deposits of ₹15 lakh. The assessee challenged jurisdiction on multiple legal grounds including limitation, absence of proper sanction u/s 151 and defects in procedure under the new reassessment regime. The ITAT examined whether the notice u/s 148 issued on 19.07.2022 under the new law complied with section 151. It observed that income alleged to have escaped assessment was only ₹15 lakh, i.e., below ₹50 lakh, and the notice was issued ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

CIT(A)’s Non-Speaking Order & Failure to Address Legal Ground- Matter Remanded Section 12AB Registration Cannot Be Denied for Missing Irrevocability Clause Alone: ITAT Follows Bombay HC Reassessment Time-Barred Despite TOLA & Ashish Agarwal: ITAT Upholds Quashing Registration Cannot Be Denied for Technical Defect: ITAT Grants Fresh Opportunity Mass Relief on 234E Fees: ITAT Deletes Levy for Pre-01.06.2015 Period View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930